AC Radio: Episode 2

17 May

Hola Peoples!

Attention Crash radio here to get your week off on the wrong foot. This week we take on old people, pedophiles, the supreme court and the 48 hour film festival wherein I expose just how crazy I am.

AttentionCrash Radio: Episode 2

Enjoy. Tell your friends. Wear the t-shirt.

Edit to add: I guess I should probably tell you that the plan is to record Monday mornings. It generally takes me a few hours to edit the whole thing together so these will be posted Monday night or Tuesday morning.

5 Responses to “AC Radio: Episode 2”

  1. Chater 19. May, 2010 at 3:02 am #

    Solid, especially with the props at the end. Thanks. This is becoming hard, finding time now for so many podcasts. This one and PJ/Rob/Donika’s are among my favorite to listen to. Keep up the work, Ben. You should look into being invited to PJ/Rob/Donika’s. Maybe get BL1Y in the mix too. That could go for an interesting podcast.

  2. Aeon 20. May, 2010 at 11:10 am #

    Great show, you really should just leave it as ” Attention Crash Radio”. Its already a good name, why fix something that isn’t broken? Unless you have another radio show with the other person, you always speak of, and its called A.C.R. as well. On a new topic, you two discussed the Supreme Court ruling that allows prisoners who have done their time to be indefinitely held based on their crime committed? I’d agree with it , if they would reclassify how sex offenders are listed. They should have to breach a certain level of offense to be even listed. I mean, If you have an underage female perform fellatio on a male over the age of 18, and he happens to finish in her mouth, he can be arrested for Sexual misconduct with a minor. Which he’ll get tagged with the “Sex offender” tag based on that, and he’ll have to carry the stigma, even if it was One-hundred percent consensual, or even if she lied about her age. And if he still shows “No remorse” for his crime, he can be held indefinitely based on the ruling. The recent ruling by them on the subject of Animal cruelty videos being illegal and the enforcement being up to the government to decide, was ruled unconstitutional. Based on the fact that the government could not be trusted to perform this routinely and fairly. What I want to know is, how is this any different? I wanna hear the show with Rob and Phil about it! Is the link on Rob’s page or Phil’s page? If you could pass me the link, I’d be grateful :)

  3. BL1Y 20. May, 2010 at 7:22 pm #

    This is coming through really choppy for me. Don’t think the problem is on my end, since I was able to listen to the other episodes just fine, an also because nothing is ever my fault.

  4. Corman 20. May, 2010 at 7:38 pm #

    Try right clicking on the show link and saving the show to your hard drive. That should alleviate the choppiness.

  5. Josh 20. May, 2010 at 10:50 pm #

    Life at 160 just called you out for your criticism of his “Worst Thing I Ever Did” post. I sense another duel. I must admit, however, that his complaints are fair. You seem to have missed the point of the post.

Leave a Reply